| 
 
The former governor of Adamawa
  State, Murtala Nyako, and his son, Abdul-aziz, are currently facing trial at
  a Federal High Court in Abuja for different cases of alleged corruption. 
The Nyakos and others are
  standing trial in a 37-count charge bordering on criminal conspiracy,
  stealing, abuse of office and money laundering to the tune of N29 billion
  preferred against them by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC)
  as they are alleged to have at various times between 2011 and 2013, used five
  companies – Blue Opal Nigeria limited, Sebore Farms & Extension Limited,
  Pagoda Fortunes Limited, Towers Assets Management Limited and Crust Energy
  Limited to commit the alleged fraud. 
As their trial continued,
  former acting governor of Adamawa State, Ahmadu Umaru Fintiri was also
  arraigned before an Abuja High Court on similar but different charges. 
Mr. Fintiri was last month
  arraigned by the EFCC on a five-count charge bordering on money laundering. 
He was said to have defrauded
  the Adamawa government to the tune of N970 million and 4.8 million dollars
  when he was the governor of the state for three months. 
As is to be expected, each of
  the cases has been unique in hearing and other processes that will lead to
  the determination of the case. 
In the case involving
  Abdulaziz Nyako, the court last month, ordered the EFCC to pay the sum of
  N12.5 million being exemplary damages in favour of the senator for unlawful
  freezing of his account and illegal detention. 
This is because the judge,
  Justice Gabriel Kolawole, held while delivering judgment in the fundamental
  rights enforcement suit, that Senator Nyako, was detained in the custody of
  the commission in excess of the period prescribed by law. 
The court in the same judgment
  also held that declaring the younger Nyako ‘wanted’ without evidence of crime
  is tantamount to a breach of his fundamental human rights by the EFCC. 
Justice Evoh Chukwu of the
  Federal High Court Abuja in a similar vein blamed the EFCC for delaying
  judgment on former governor Nyako’s case.  
This was after the counsel to
  Nyako, Yakubu Maikyau said they needed to study a document tendered by the
  EFCC counsel because it was voluminous before going on with the
  cross-examination which justice Chukwu sustained explaining that the document
  should have been served to Nyako’s counsel, Maikyau long before now, adding
  that the fresh document amounts to delay of judgment. 
 But before the
  conclusion of the case, Justice Chukwu who was handling the trial of the
  former Adamawa State governor and his two children as well as other major
  cases like the trial of former officials of the Nigerian Football Federation
  (NFF), Sani Lulu, Taiwo Ogunjobi and others died. 
The Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Justice Ibrahim
  Auta, then re-assigned the case to Justice Okon Abang following the death of
  Chukwu in June.  
The case was initially scheduled to commence afresh by way
  of re-arraignment on July 7. However, the court could not sit due to the extension
  of the Eid-el-Fitri holiday announced by the Federal Government on July 5,
  further delaying the case as the EFCC will now have to re-arraign the former
  governor and his son before Justice Okon Abang on September 12, 2016. Even as the matter has dragged due to no fault of the accused persons, it is pertinent to point out that the delay in dispensing with the case, which the late judge complained about is set to further aggravate with the processes, as the new judge handling the case needs time to appraise himself with the facts of the matter. 
But of serious concern is
  another coincidence, having to do with the fact that the wife of the former
  governor, who is a step mother to the other accused person, who are both
  being arraigned, is also a judge in a federal High Court in Abuja. 
Previous cases that are
  similar in nature have raised concerns in the past and it will not be out of
  place to ask certain questions if only to ensure a fulfillment of a vital
  requirement in the dispensation of justice, which is seeing that justice is
  not only done but seemed to be done. 
Candidate of the All
  Progressives Congress (APC) in the last governorship election in Rivers
  State, Dr. Dakuku Peterside, not long ago raised an issue out of a similar
  coincidence when the wife of a former governor of the state, Justice Mary
  Odili, who is believed to be close to Governor Nyesom Wike, a party in a
  matter that went to the Supreme Court, was serving as a judge when the apex
  court delivered its judgment. 
Peterside said "credible
  information" confirmed that Wike had met with the Supreme Court justices
  that sat on the matter at different places before the judgment was delivered
  stressing that Wike himself confirmed during his thanksgiving service that
  former governor of the state, Dr. Peter Odili, and his wife, Mary (a justice
  of the Supreme Court), were his advisers. 
He said, "Despite my
  acceptance and temperate public comments on the verdict of the Supreme Court
  on January 27, 2016, Wike, by his unguarded utterance last Sunday, seems to
  give credence to the pervading doubt being expressed on the judgment in
  public space especially in the media”. 
"For the record, in his
  speech at the church service, Wike probably forgot that he was on live
  telecast when he stated: 'Let me thank our former governor, Dr. Peter Odili
  (husband of Supreme Court Justice, Mary Odili). He will call me midnight to
  tell me what to do....he will say go so so place." I took all his
  advice, and here we are today." 
Though Wike reacted by saying
  Peterside was crying wolf and trying to incite President Muhammadu Buhari and
  the military against the governor and the people of the state, the point made
  by Peterside cannot be waved aside. 
Parties usually feel
  uncomfortable if they notice any development that would erode their confidence
  in the impartiality of the courts and the court, when such issues are raised
  usually obliges in order to give a sense of justice to all. 
It is to avoid such
  accusations and doubts in the judicial system that it becomes imperative to
  point out that having both Nyako and his son, tried before an Abuja Federal High
  Court when a member of their family is a judge within the same precinct
  should call for concern. 
Not only that, but there is
  also the need to draw attention to the case of the former acting governor,
  Fintiri, coming in an Abuja Federal High Court for the same reason. 
Fintiri it was who played a
  major role as speaker of the Adamawa State House of Assembly that led to the
  impeachment of Nyako in 2014. 
If the coincidence in the case
  of Nyako and his son can be ignored on the basis that the facts of the case
  would speak for itself, that of Fintiri should bother any unbiased mind due
  to the no love lost relationship between him and members of the Nyako family. 
 | 
Pages
▼
Pages
▼
No comments:
Post a Comment